Wednesday, 28 August 2013

Today Is Martin Luther King Day

  • RE: Private & Confidential Ngozi Godwell‏‏

Cc: XXXXX bbc south.newsonline
Outlook Active View
1 attachment (52.8 KB)
Download 24. Reply to Mrs Godwell.pdf (52.8 KB)
24. Reply to Mrs Godwell.pdf
View online
Det Constable 505 Otis Goldsmith

Dear Otis

As follows is my response. 

I quote:

"I am not unsympathetic as to your quest, and am fully aware of the process you are facing in obtaining contact with your daughter as outlined in your material posted on-line, but again regret to inform you that we cannot intervene in any judicial process on your behalf."

Sympathy is a negative force, for this reason alone to sympathise with me is a clear waste of time and reveals you are not here to help me. I want action. The only action I have seen in the last five years is a man carrying an axe to kill me. This alone speaks volumes about the hate displayed.

The police did intervene here:

The force took my child to deal with me,without a court order or warrant. The force can intervene once and can do so again. Return my child!

 By law the force should have then returned my child.

The force took my child with the sole intention of never returning my child. Instead of removing the professionals who had the nerve to gloat and spill the beans, return my child. Anyway the evidence is on the internet my child was taken, because of race hate. Otis you are mistaken all my works reveal the issue is to do with the return of my child not contact. I do not have contact with my child. What I have is a group of people who churn out racist comments doing what they do with my child and I (below highlighted in pink). When we do see, my child and I are treated with sheer control. One can smell the race hate, even when typing. That is not contact. I do not know where my child is! Control a group of white people controlling us, when yobs and their parents are free to do what they please. What does this reveal?

What judicial process is it you do refer to, there was none. On that note here is this:

The high court judge in Northampton ignored point 6. It is against the law within England and Wales to ignore the perfected judgment of a higher judge and the judge who did give judgment is not permitted to change his or her judgment once the judgment is perfected. The judicial body who investigates judges is unable to investigate His Honour Judge Stephen Waine, because this judge is now retired and disciplinary action would not be able to be actioned.  The police is the only outside body permitted to investigate. Northamptonshire police force have a duty and responsibility to investigate my complaint about the judge. As with the IPCC you have confirmed that you have accessed my websites, but you do nothing.  My family's tormentors refusing to investigate what a surprise, but they have plenty of time to abuse me and expect me to be a doormat, because I am black. I want my child back, where did I state I never have. Crack addicts and people who ARE mentally ill have their children, but I guess this has to to with race and my case is personal.

Again I quote:

"You did raise the fact that you feel we should have contacted your solicitor to discuss the matter. We have spoken to the officer in the case, PC York, and I understand that an arrangement has now been agreed with your solicitor at Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors that all further correspondence, including standard bail changes, will be sent to them in the first instance."

"Please note that although this arrangement is in place for the existing case it may be that officers feel the need to visit you in response to other incidents reported to us."

"I hope this information has been of use to you and enables you to understand why you were visited to inform you of your bail conditions."

Strange how others are never visited when I make complaints. Let me not mention the FACT my family are the victims of racial harassment. The people in my neighbourhood, whom I had not seen all day smashed into my home whilst I lay asleep on my settee, then attempted  to murder me. What visits did they get?
What did the police do about this?
Join in with the abuse and refuse to take a statement from me. You refuse to touch on this issue, even though the manner in which the police did deal with the issue is on a public website; which you admit you have accessed alongside Northampton Borough Council. By the way, since when did the police start delivering 'notices seeking possession' on behalf of the council?
I sat by my window and observed two officers only, approach my home.  The police have been harassing me for years, because of my race and the IPCC have agreed with me. Basing their views on the same websites you now do refer from.

On that note, I need the police to provide to me the requested items as detailed within the contents of the following link 

As for the bail conditions and the visit what has this got to do with 'to other incidents'?
The matter is as such, I have a lawyer who receives legal aid to deal with any information concerning bail dates and conditions or I am updated when I attend the station. Not the police turning up on my doorstep to discuss change of bail dates when I have retained the service of a lawyer.  
To prove my point on 25th August 2013 the police changed my bail conditions. I did not need to attend to be re-bailed where were the police then?

Furthermore, when my life is in danger I do not see the dust of the police. For example man breaks into my home, I am a woman I whoop his backside and observe the police bending over backwards to paint this man as a hero. Fact, if I am white the treatment of I would be different. On the balance of probabilities I may have ended up in the local newspaper, because I whooped his backside and ended up calling for his mother to help him, after he and others broke into my home. 

I do also note no reference is made to O'Connell attending my home to issue me with a harassment warning after I did serve the police with court papers. Then, later coming to my home to arrest me. He had no right to come near me when his name is a key feature in my complaints about Northamptonshire police FORCE.

Another quote:
You made reference to the fact you were interviewed by The Metropolitan Police without an appropriate adult, yet were provided one by Northamptonshire Police. 

I must point out I originally made my complaint to Northamptonshire police force, who I believe to be biased and incompetent, so requested the MET investigate instead.
PACE 1984 cites clear guidelines about the procedure in reference to the 'appropriate adult', this is for all police in England and Wales. My lawyer has written to me to advise me that she has made a request to PC York for a copy of my custody record as to why an 'appropriate adult' was requested, this is not the first time the force has treated me this way. Indeed the first time, the individual was not an 'appropriate adult', but the police decided to document that he was. This took place in 2008 after yet again the police forced themselves into my home with the sole intent of arresting me, without giving me a warrant permitting them to do so and throwing me in a mental hospital; which is the same treatment many blacks in Northamptonshire do receive. Whilst a white man can carry an axe, to kill and is not sent to prison let alone sectioned. Instead he is treated like Royalty. My matter is to do with racial harassment and until the return of my child, I will be including the police as perpetrators in my complaints. 

Otis, please make sure that the custody record is sent to me as with the other items I have requested through Professional Standards and the website page Evidence on 

I have touched on the issues, relevant at this current time. Your other comments are duly noted. Thank you sharing your expertise with me, sadly I did not meet you years ago. Lastly, I will draw to your attention the threat of the police barring my telephone number, they still have not done so. If this was done,  on the fateful night of my attempted murder I would have not wasted my time fighting and trying to get to the telephone and call 999.  It was my right to defend myself in my home after the break-in. I should have focused all my energies on the fight, if I had the police would  not be doing what they are doing now; which is abusing me. What is new?

I will be grateful that you see that this is followed through. If in the future I am attacked again or need the assistance of the police I will not be able to get through, if I am foolish enough to think about dialling your number. What a waste the last 8 years have been. My life has gone nowhere and the force refuse to compensate me for all it has put me through, instead I am on bail then informed my bail is dropped, to save me from attending the station all the time. I am supposed to be grateful as I wait for CPS to find evidence to charge me?
It is explained to me how the police went about helping Mr Jarvis get away with his crimes against me, reinforcing the fact that my dealings with the police are based on race hate. I refuse to be consumed by the hate. I will leave this with the source and expect Jarvis to be sectioned shortly.
Instead of giving this man a restraining order the establishment place a rope around my neck and pull when they see fit. Observe my child, a walking tramp. This is how the police help us and now the police help the council to kick me out of my home. This is my fault, as a black single parent I brought a black child to a town where the community is clearly a white minority and is under resourced. I never knew racism is still rife in key areas. 

Thank you for your time, this I am grateful for.  Confirms to me that the police have succeeded and killed my family; whilst doing their up most to find means to lock me up. If it was me that had smashed into a person's home with an axe the police would have put me in a cell, killed me and reported that I committed suicide.  I was able to whoop the backside of Jarvis if I had failed the report would have read I committed suicide, I make this statement based on the fact the police and council treat my attackers as kings and queens. The force now have my child and does what it wants with her. A young black girl, this story stinks from start to finish. I am banned from my own child, because the police took her and say this is how it MUST be.Then blame me! 

The police abducted my child to deal with me. Fair enough at least my websites will make proactive black and white people think twice, before settling with their children in Northampton. 

Closing, today is MLK day, despite all the local body have put me through I am proud to be black, I adore my identity, I am privliaged to be a woman and I am so grateful that I was borne, bred and educated in London. I am proud! If my child and I were living in London they would not dare treat us this way. Before the police van turn up to throw me out,  bring back my child and produce the photograph of the axe Jarvis used to smash into my home, so I can give this to the judge! 

Closing with this insult and I shall leave it as that. I quote:
"Please note that although this arrangement is in place for the existing case it may be that officers feel the need to visit you in response to other incidents reported to us."

Respectfully yours,
Ngozi A. Godwell BSc (Hons), Dip. Ind.

where the community is clearly a white minority - meant to read majority.
Not rectified within the email.

No comments:

Post a Comment