Saturday, 10 November 2012

Cafcass Initial Analysis and Recommendations Of Diane Clark

Cafcass Initial Analysis and Recommendations 

Of  Diane Clark

Diane Clark, Guardians ad litem, whistle-blower for the local council. No, not to promote justice , but to use her position to cover up any claims for litigation, most importantly the abuses of children in care.

What they do is change the facts to fit the event that they wish to portray and they are still doing this. Introduction of the Second Guardian, Mr. Richard Lee. Children are at risk. Those two people have no interest in the children. Must be the money and other perks given to them. Do you know in 2009 Clark set up her own business providing services to the council. Have a guess the type of commodity on supply, CHILDREN. 

 I want to remind the readers that it is important that the historical background of my complaints are relevant  because it is those issues that have led to the predicament that affects me today. Of prime importance the issues led to Northamptonshire local bodies treatment of my family. This is common sense.  


Unlawful Government Action | Is the case of Minor G another Dunblane Cover up?

Sunday, 4 November 2012

Northamptonshire County Council: Diane Clark, Guardians Ad Litem

Northamptonshire County Council: Diane Clark, 

Guardian Ad Litem

I am Ngozi Godwell.  This Blog is about my family. By law I am entitled to tell my story and what a story. Instead of giving my child back observe how they treat my child and I. The fact of the matter is this, you are supposed to trust the police

The first thing social services did when Northamptonshire Police Force took my child was to go through my telephone bills and my bank accounts, trying to find something on me, anything to give them an excuse to retain my child without my permission. This is why Northamptonshire Police Force had me locked up in a police cell for 48 hours, they had to workout what to do with my child and I, because when they looked beyond the black face and dug deeper they realised they had made a big mistake and all I would do is collect my child and sue for damages.  

When Police And Prosecutors Knowingly Break Laws.

When the police beat me up and took my child in the planned attack, within half an hour of having my child they soon realised they had made a big mistake.  I am a strong woman and will remain so.

This year did lawyer for the council Claire Bates Claire Bateswrite to the Civil Appeal Office and state that I will lie about what happened to my child?
What is there to lie about, what is it they are trying to hide?
My child is now under a psychiatrist as instructed by His Honour Judge Waine, when this man ignored the judgment of the Supreme Court.  They are all in it together as thick as thieves, who go around stealing other peoples children.

The Mistake They Did Not Make
Part of the neighbourhood gang, An example of the white people that Northamptonshire Police Force and affiliates say my child and I must become. They are loads more people who came from other estates.

DS 1323 ANDY ROGERS told me; "We are working to get the result that we are happy with". when i asked him if i am INCLUDED in the we,  he put the telephone down. this was after his COLLEAGUE called me and said i deserved it.  rogers never collected a witness statement from me. he did not inform me of the courT hearing date

Northamptonshire: Cops and system assaulted me with a plan they hoping I would kill myself and they raged hard when I did not, would not.  Raging harder that the three people, who took  it upon themselves to execute me failed in their quest.  

Lord Justice Alan Ward

Parents Rights Blog

Diane Clark, Guardians ad litem, whistle-blower for the local council. No, not to promote justice , but to use her position to cover up any claims for litigation, most importantly the abuses of children in care.  

 Many children in foster care are at risk.  My question,how did some of the children in Northamptonshire get to be placed in foster care in the first instance?

More Posts About Ngozi Godwell

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Northamptonshire Police Force UK DS 1323 Andy Rogers

Northamptonshire Police Force UK DS 1323 Andy Rogers 

This morning 1st November I have lodged a complaint with the police in reference to DS 1323 Andy Rogers  CID Officer and the investigation he with his team where supposed to have conducted on my behalf, in respect to the complaint I made directly to the police. As usual I did supply this blog address when making my complaint. This is important, DS 1323 Andy Rogers  CID Officer refused to take a formal witness statement from me, I made numerous requests for him or someone from his team to do so. No such statement was ever collected from me.    

Sadly, I have to report that last week I did eventually speak directly to DS 1323 Andy Rogers and can confirm that he told me that Mr. Dean Jarvis is charged with affray and given a ONLY a caution. 

So it is true, if Mr. Dean Jarvis of 87 Raeburn Road had succeeded with the plan to kill me; the police would have just called it suicide.  This event was a joined planned affair which Northamptonshirepolice did know about, well before the event took place. The police are always the last to know, the event was planned for years.    

If successful what they would have done is told my child that their mother had committed suicide an. The fact that I was not murdered must be a source of contention for Northamptonshire police force and Northampton Borough Council?
The manner in which they handled the crimeagainst me was improper and unprofessional


Northamptonshire Police Force UK DS 1323 Andy Rogers